Why a rigorous understanding of collective adaptation?

news
review
Author

Matthew A. Turner

Published

August 12, 2024

Our world faces threats of climate change, ecosystem loss, pandemics, political and social instability, and more. We humans are challenged to respond with adaptations that mitigate or prevent greater catastrophe (Pisor, Lansing, and Magargal 2023; Currie et al. 2024). Collective adaptation is an emergent phenomena composed of constituent sub-processes occurring across several time, population, and geographic/spatial scales: from milliseconds to millenia; from an individual to dyads to the global metapopulation; and from micrometers-long neurons to global-scale communication networks (Galesic et al. 2023). If we can develop a rigorous understanding of how collective adaptation works, we may be better able to optimize “stewardship of global collective behavior” (Bak-Coleman et al. 2021). Modern stewardship of collective behavior at all population scales needs the scientific, rigorous understanding of collective adaptation we contribute to in the RUCA project.

Sketch of collective human and non-human collective adaptation. Novel technologies and threats both emerge from human cultural evolution. Pandemic-causing pathogens, biodiversity, and human culture all co-evolve on commensurate time scales.

Non-human populations, from viruses to whales, also co-adapt and co-evolve. Pathogen evolution is important cases due to the risk of disease outbreaks when pathogens spill over from non-human animals (e.g., birds, bats, pigs) to humans. Spillovers are increasingly common in the new epoch of rapid global change (Baker et al. 2022). In spillovers, pathogens are initially poorly adapted to their new human hosts, but can rescue themselves through evolution (Visher et al. 2021). Pathogen evolution is sensitive to metapopulation group structure (Best et al. 2011), and therefore pathogen evolution may be sensitive to changes in human group size, asymmetric homophily levels, out-group aversion, and rising extremism and polarization. If we could predict which groups are most likely to get infected, and which individuals are best to target for intervention towards pandemic preparedness behaviors (such as getting vaccinated), we could more efficiently use available resources.

Beyond applications to critical problems, collective adaptation theory can be used to better understand culture in other species, for example whales who collectively generate, through transmission and modulation, a cumulative cultural repertoire of whale songs (Garland, Garrigue, and Noad 2022).

The RUCA approach

Rigor takes time, following a step-wise approach to understand which parts of a system interact, and how, to cause the emergence of higher-order processes constituted by those interactions. This is known as mechanistic modeling (Matthew Adam Turner and Smaldino 2022). Mechanistic models are useful for emergent phenomena such as collective adaptation because they force experimenters to explicitly state what are the component parts of their system of interest (Kauffman 1970) and how do they interact to produce some process composed of numerous such interactions (Craver 2006). My work develops mechanistic models that synthesize, connect, and clarify diverse adaptive and social processes and understand the sometimes unexpected consequences of the interaction of these processes and the environment (Matthew Adam Turner and Smaldino 2018; Matthew A. Turner and Smaldino 2020; Matthew A. Turner et al. 2023a; Matthew A. Turner et al. 2023b).

References

Bak-Coleman, Joseph B., Mark Alfano, Wolfram Barfuss, Carl T. Bergstrom, Miguel A. Centeno, Iain D. Couzin, Jonathan F. Donges, et al. 2021. Stewardship of global collective behavior.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118 (27): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025764118.
Baker, Rachel E., Ayesha S. Mahmud, Ian F. Miller, Malavika Rajeev, Fidisoa Rasambainarivo, Benjamin L. Rice, Saki Takahashi, et al. 2022. Infectious disease in an era of global change.” Nature Reviews Microbiology 20 (4): 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00639-z.
Best, Alex, Steve Webb, Andy White, and Mike Boots. 2011. Host resistance and coevolution in spatially structured populations.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278 (1715): 2216–22. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1978.
Craver, Carl F. 2006. When mechanistic models explain.” Synthese 153 (3): 355–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9097-x.
Currie, Thomas E., Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Laurel Fogarty, Maja Schlüter, Carl Folke, L. Jamila Haider, Guido Caniglia, et al. 2024. Integrating evolutionary theory and social-ecological systems research to address the sustainability challenges of the Anthropocene.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 379 (1893). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0262.
Galesic, Mirta, Daniel Barkoczi, Andrew M. Berdhal, Dora Biro, Giuseppe Carbone, Ilaria Giannoccaro, Robert L. Goldstone, et al. 2023. Beyond collective intelligence : Collective adaptation.” Journal of the Royal Society Interface 20 (20220736). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2022.0736.
Garland, Ellen C., Claire Garrigue, and Michael J. Noad. 2022. When does cultural evolution become cumulative culture? A case study of humpback whale song.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 377 (1843). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0313.
Kauffman, Stuart A. 1970. Articulation of Parts Explanation in Biology and the Rational Search for Them.” In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 257–72.
Pisor, Anne, J. Stephen Lansing, and Kate Magargal. 2023. Climate change adaptation needs a science of culture.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 378 (1889). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0390.
Turner, Matthew Adam, and Paul E. Smaldino. 2018. Paths to Polarization: How Extreme Views, Miscommunication, and Random Chance Drive Opinion Dynamics.” Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2740959.
———. 2022. Mechanistic Modeling for the Masses - commentary on Yarkoni, "The generalizability crisis".” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45 (E33). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X2100039X.
Turner, Matthew A., Cristina Moya, Paul E. Smaldino, and James Holland Jones. 2023a. The form of uncertainty affects selection for social learning.” Evolutionary Human Sciences 5. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2023.11.
Turner, Matthew A, Alyson L Singleton, Mallory J Harris, Ian Harryman, Cesar Augusto Lopez, Ronan Forde Arthur, Caroline Muraida, and James Holland Jones. 2023b. Minority-group incubators and majority-group reservoirs support the diffusion of climate change adaptations.”
Turner, Matthew A, and Paul E Smaldino. 2020. Stubborn extremism as a potential pathway to group polarization.” In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Visher, Elisa, Claire Evensen, Sarah Guth, Edith Lai, Marina Norfolk, Carly Rozins, Nina A. Sokolov, Melissa Sui, and Michael Boots. 2021. The three Ts of virulence evolution during zoonotic emergence.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 288 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0900.