Overview and syllabus

Introduction

Hello, and welcome to the course website for Computational Social Science for Sustainability, developed and taught by Dr. Matthew Turner, and offered Winter 2025 for Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability undergraduates and graduate students! Join the course to develop a nuanced understanding of human social behavior while learning new computational and presentation skills in the R programming language.

Course structure

We meet twice weekly, currently scheduled for Monday and Wednesday 11:30am-12:50pm, but subject to change, location pending. Each week will have twin themes, one social science phenomenon (e.g., political polarization) and one computational technique or skill (e.g., agent-based modeling).

Syllabus

Each week will feature one lecture focused on a select topic from social science for sustainability (S3).

Week Lecture description Lab description Readings
1 Sustainable behaviors to adapt to a changing world “Yes, and” storytelling exercise McNamara et al. (2020); Jones, Ready, and Pisor (2021); Pisor et al. (2022); Galesic et al. (2023); Kling et al. (2024)
2 Social learning, social influence, and uncertainty Agent-based model of adaptation diffusion and opinion dynamics Otto and Whitlock (2013); Acerbi, Mesoudi, and Smolla (2022), Chapter 1; Flache and Macy (2011); Matthew A. Turner and Smaldino (2018); Matthew A. Turner et al. (2023a)
3 Group structure and metapopulation theory Adaptation diffusion in group-structured social networks Cikara and Van Bavel (2014); Derex and Boyd (2016); Matthew A. Turner et al. (2023b)
4 Animal studies; Bayesian modeling and statistical analysis King Markov; Model fits following Silk et al. (2005) McElreath (2020), Chapters 9 and 11: Ch. 9 introduces Markov Chain Monte Carlo, Ch. 11 uses Silk et al. (2005) data and follows their analysis

The ten-week course will consist of ten full lectures and ten sections focused on computing skills with some lecture, but mostly hands-on practice to make sure students learn the skills they need to complete weekly project assignments. Weekly assignments will combine software development and writing, requiring students to write a mini 2-page journal article-style papers every week. Students will motivate and explain a model they help program, analyze model outputs and explain the results, and explain the broader importance of the work. These papers will follow the IMAD structure: Introduction, Model (or Methods), Analysis, and Discussion, also known as the IMRaD structure where “Results and” replaces “Analysis”.

Weekly assignments, midterm and final exams, midterm and final projects

Initial idea, subject to change!

  • Weekly assignments: There will be eight weekly assignments total, taking weeks off for midterm and final weeks to focus on projects and exams. Each will be worth 10 points.
  • Midterm and final exams: There will be a midterm and final written exam possibly including written mathematics, mathematical derivations, and pseudocode solutions to logic or programming problems. The midterm exam will be worth 20 points; the final will be 30 points.
  • Midterm project: 30 points
  • Final project: 40 points

Weekly assignment

10 points per weekly assignment: I, 2pts; M 2pts, Code 3pts; R 3pts; D 1 pt. 

Midterm exam:

Written responses, formal calculations, explaining formalisms, writing pseudocode 20 pts

Final exam:

Written responses, formal calculations, explaining formalisms, writing pseudocode 40 pts

Midterm project:

Pick one of the weekly assignments and expand upon it based upon your own interests. Same grading as weekly project, but scaled up to 20 points. Minimum 2000 words in IMAD/IMRaD format.

Final project

I will suggest several potential final projects, and students may invent their own. Same grading distribution as weekly project, but scaled up to 40 points. Minimum 3000 words in IMAD/IMRaD format.

References

Acerbi, Alberto, Alex Mesoudi, and Marco Smolla. 2022. Individual-based models of cultural evolution: A step-by-step guide using R. London: Routledge. https://acerbialberto.com/IBM-cultevo/.
Cikara, Mina, and Jay J. Van Bavel. 2014. The Neuroscience of Intergroup Relations: An Integrative Review.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 9 (3): 245–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614527464.
Derex, Maxime, and Robert Boyd. 2016. Partial connectivity increases cultural accumulation within groups.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (11): 2982–87. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518798113.
Flache, Andreas, and Michael W. Macy. 2011. Small Worlds and Cultural Polarization.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 35 (1-3): 146–76.
Galesic, Mirta, Daniel Barkoczi, Andrew M. Berdhal, Dora Biro, Giuseppe Carbone, Ilaria Giannoccaro, Robert L. Goldstone, et al. 2023. Beyond collective intelligence : Collective adaptation.” Journal of the Royal Society Interface 20 (20220736). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2022.0736.
Jones, James Holland, Elspeth Ready, and Anne C. Pisor. 2021. Want climate-change adaptation? Evolutionary theory can help.” American Journal of Human Biology 33 (4): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23539.
Kling, Matthew M., Christopher T. Brittain, Gillian L. Galford, Timothy M. Waring, Laurent Hébert-Dufresne, Matthew P. Dube, Hossein Sabzian, Nicholas J. Gotelli, Brian J. McGill, and Meredith T. Niles. 2024. Innovations through crop switching happen on the diverse margins of US agriculture.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 121 (42): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2402195121.
McElreath, Richard. 2020. Statistical Rethinking. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
McNamara, Karen E., Rachel Clissold, Ross Westoby, Annah E. Piggott-McKellar, Roselyn Kumar, Tahlia Clarke, Frances Namoumou, et al. 2020. An assessment of community-based adaptation initiatives in the Pacific Islands.” Nature Climate Change 10 (7): 628–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0813-1.
Otto, Sarah P, and Michael C Whitlock. 2013. Fixation Probabilities and Times.” Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, no. June. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0005464.pub3.
Pisor, Anne C., Xavier Basurto, Kristina G. Douglass, Katharine J. Mach, Elspeth Ready, Jason M. Tylianakis, Ashley Hazel, et al. 2022. Effective climate change adaptation means supporting community autonomy.” Nature Climate Change 12 (3): 210–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01279-8.
Silk, Joan B., Sarah F. Brosnan, Jennifer Vonk, Joseph Henrich, Daniel J. Povinelli, Amanda S. Richardson, Susan P. Lambeth, Jenny Mascaro, and Steven J. Schapiro. 2005. Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members.” Nature 437 (7063): 1357–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04243.
Turner, Matthew A., Cristina Moya, Paul E. Smaldino, and James Holland Jones. 2023a. The form of uncertainty affects selection for social learning.” Evolutionary Human Sciences 5. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2023.11.
Turner, Matthew A, Alyson L Singleton, Mallory J Harris, Ian Harryman, Cesar Augusto Lopez, Ronan Forde Arthur, Caroline Muraida, and James Holland Jones. 2023b. Minority-group incubators and majority-group reservoirs support the diffusion of climate change adaptations.”
Turner, Matthew A., and Paul E. Smaldino. 2018. Paths to Polarization: How Extreme Views, Miscommunication, and Random Chance Drive Opinion Dynamics.” Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2740959.